|
Post by jayco35 on Jan 18, 2012 11:35:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by TAY666 on Jan 18, 2012 22:59:29 GMT -5
As I said on FB. I like it, can't wait to see more pics.
|
|
|
Post by jeffbrown on Jan 20, 2012 13:11:40 GMT -5
looks good, I like the skin texture; makes it look "armored". I'm not so sure about the "teeth". Remember they didn't have teeth; the fangs are part of the bony plates that make up the head. the best way to decribe it would be a turtle head which is what the scientists thought they had found when they saw the skull for the first time. the Cleveland museum has a full size model on thier website or you could look up pictures of snapping turtles that would give you a good idea of what they looked like since thier jaws work the same way. one other interesting fact; this is the oldest animal that the color of the skin is known, maroon/red on the top and iridescent silver underneath. not sure how they figured that out though, but it is cool.
|
|
|
Post by pbbass3313 on Jan 21, 2012 1:02:49 GMT -5
Agree.....Alchemy Works comes a little closer with their version, but thanks for the heads up on the Cleveland Museum info - will keep that in mind when I work on mine!
Who are these guys!?
|
|
|
Post by TAY666 on Jan 21, 2012 20:52:12 GMT -5
What guys? If you are asking about Jayco, John has been in the GK business for ages. And I can vouch for him 110%
|
|
|
Post by prescenes2 on Jan 22, 2012 1:45:57 GMT -5
I think it looks cool!
|
|
|
Post by desslock on Jan 22, 2012 3:41:58 GMT -5
Love the idea of a new line of related kits, as the Prehistoric Encounters moniker seems to imply.
The Dunkleosteus is one of my favorite prehistoric creatures, so I'm happy to see it featured in a kit - agree with the comments above that it would be better if the "teeth" didn't look separate- they should seamlessly be part of the face, since there was no "skin" over the armored face and the "teeth" were just part of the armor -- but it's not as if the Prehistoric Scenes kits are historically accurate either (the ceratops teeth!) -- all that matter to me is that the scene looks cool, and this kit is certainly off to an impressive start.
|
|
|
Post by desslock on Jan 22, 2012 3:49:29 GMT -5
Actually, I amend my comment after looking at a bunch of pictures of the Dunkleosteus - some of them are pictured with the "teeth" looking a lot like the sculpt, so great job. fun Dunk video www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQ2pAnJdYsc
|
|
|
Post by scooke123 on Jan 22, 2012 12:47:01 GMT -5
I like what I see so far!!
|
|
|
Post by jayco35 on Feb 29, 2012 18:39:29 GMT -5
Thanks guys we did a little homework from various sites and skulls and thought this was best approach. The other figure I hope will be done in the next month. Its about 90% complete just doing some minor fixes to get it right. Will post more pics as I get them. Thanks Trev for the vouch.
|
|
|
Post by andymoscarts on Feb 29, 2012 19:16:25 GMT -5
Looks bloody fantastic!
|
|
|
Post by cromagnonman2000 on Mar 6, 2012 21:42:24 GMT -5
I'm definitely looking forward to this one, and am going through a prehistoric water monsters phase nowadays!
|
|
|
Post by desslock on Mar 7, 2012 0:28:50 GMT -5
Me too. I love the Chased by Sea Monsters series from the Walking With... BBC production guys, and Augusta/Burian's Prehistoric Seas giant book.
|
|
|
Post by prescenes2 on Jul 5, 2012 0:58:02 GMT -5
Any updates?
|
|
|
Post by pbbass3313 on Oct 4, 2012 10:41:02 GMT -5
Any more updates......... Got Mike's Dunkle, Elasmo, Krono and just got the Mosasaur. Waiting on Steve's Ichthy to start laying out the "ocean scene" and what to consider where to fit this sculpt in....
|
|
|
Post by pbbass3313 on Oct 10, 2013 13:35:42 GMT -5
Well it's been a year since I asked this question.....any update!?
|
|
|
Post by prescenes2 on Oct 10, 2013 22:04:14 GMT -5
I've wondered this too?!
|
|